- 4,466
- 378
Due to ad astra?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
The Long Awaited SCP Upgrade
- Thread starter WeeklyBattles
- Start date
-
- Tags
- scp foundation
- 61,134
- 14,630
- Thread starter
- #242
Due to Ad Astra and the other statements of Yesod containing uncountably infinite multiverss with uncountably infinite universes in them
- 17,847
- 17,424
For Azathoth's mothers sake man....
- 40,771
- 35,297
For helvetes sake would you just post the wolfin scans weekly?
- 4,466
- 378
i suppose that come from "Existential Planes 1 to 2 through ℵ0 and onwards", right?
- 4,273
- 2,796
For the record, i'll wait for the supposed uncountably infinite scans.
Until then, i'm in agreement with 2-A, likely Low 1-C, possibly Higher.
One more question, why will we not use the likely 6D statements for Low 1-C? Sorry if this has already been addressed.
Until then, i'm in agreement with 2-A, likely Low 1-C, possibly Higher.
One more question, why will we not use the likely 6D statements for Low 1-C? Sorry if this has already been addressed.
- 61,134
- 14,630
- Thread starter
- #247
"Post the scans!"
'Posts scans'
"Post the scans!"
'post scans again'
"You havent posted the scan!!!!!"
...
- 17,847
- 17,424
I've yet to see such a scan on this thread. Once more, can you please post it?
- 10,688
- 4,812
I'm getting Deja Vu from the DB thread where he did this same thing
- 14,995
- 12,613
They're at the start of the thread.
The Ad Astra one isn't definitively Low 1-C, which Ultima agreed with, and the 4555 one has dodgy scaling to the tree, which Ultima doesn't feel qualified to discuss.
It's literally the same scans that Weekly put under a "likely" at the start of the thread, but now that there's no temporal dimensions shenanigans and it might stay at 2-A, he feels the need to switch over for literally no reason.
- 383
- 218
The infinite multiverse part imo does fall under 2-A
Please post it. I can't help but feel like this weekly guy is giving staff an awful look
- 40,771
- 35,297
Arrogance hurts his reputation.
Then I remain steadfast on 2-A likely Low 1-C, possibly Higher
- 17,847
- 17,424
Wait, is the "uncountably infinite universes" statement the SCP 4555 one????
- 4,466
- 378
well Ad Astra have higher dimensional worlds stuff contained in whatever.
but this is at peak likely, the aleph 0 stuff isn't uncontable infinite so
- 61,134
- 14,630
- Thread starter
- #256
No, thats not bing used here
- 14,995
- 12,613
Well then there's just Ad Astra, which Ultima and I evaluated as only likely Low 1-C. :L
- 40,771
- 35,297
Then what is Low 1-C there weekly? Outside of ad astra Enlighten me.
- 17,847
- 17,424
Then what in the 18 layers of hell is "uncountably infinite universes" in the OP if not that?
- 61,134
- 14,630
- Thread starter
- #260
The stuf on the profiles that was already agreed on as being legit
- 17,847
- 17,424
We're going in circles now. If nothing on this thread is a scan then please post it here. Right now. No "but it's already on the profile!" stuff.
- 14,995
- 12,613
Weekly made the same defense to you over a hundred posts ago and never supplied anything. Good luck getting anything out of him this time.
- 383
- 218
I thought staff were here to supply accurate statistics? WTF is this???
- 17,847
- 17,424
Also Agnaa, sorry if I might be derailing but what happened to the note on the tiering system page about multiple sets of infinite universes not being above baseline by default? It seems to have been removed so I wonder if that no longer applies.
- 14,995
- 12,613
I'm not sure what happened to it but I'm 99% sure it still applies. I'll go investigate.
- 40,771
- 35,297
Dealing with WeeklyBattles is what this is.
- 14,995
- 12,613
It got moved to the Tiering System FAQ page, and still applies.
- 61,134
- 14,630
- Thread starter
- #268
This is accurate. Thus far the couterarguments to this revision are:
1. "Its not accurate because 4555 doesnt apply." Even though there are statements of the Yesod multiverse having a Low 1-C structure without using 4555 as evidence hence why 4555 was removed from the OP.
2. "Temporal dimensions dont apply." Even though the OP is talking about spatial dimensions with applicable dimensional superiority which qualifies for Low 1-C.
The people agains it are the ones arguing for inaccurate stats, not me.
- 4,273
- 2,796
That was directed against you, Weekly.
The low 1-C justification is 5-D noosphere shenanigans, not whatever the Low 1-C Yesod statements you apparently have are.
The low 1-C justification is 5-D noosphere shenanigans, not whatever the Low 1-C Yesod statements you apparently have are.
- 14,995
- 12,613
The counterargument is actually:
- The A Hole In Mars statement isn't solidly Low 1-C since it butchers the maths in an awkward way, so it should only be put at likely.
- Yesod containing an infinite number of infinite multiverses isn't a Low 1-C feat and has never been.
- The revision started off with Weekly accepting these principles, which when combined with temporal dimensions, made the tiers "At least Low 1-C, likely 1-C, possibly higher", but now that they're disqualified and that would make the tiers "At least 2-A, likely Low 1-C, possibly higher" Weekly disagrees with it without providing any new arguments as to why. Just "My opposition's the ones who really don't have any arguments!"
- 61,134
- 14,630
- Thread starter
- #271
Noosphere isnt part of this either,the 5-D stuff comes from Ad Astra
- 4,273
- 2,796
I would implore you to read the previous statements on Ad Astra.
- 61,134
- 14,630
- Thread starter
- #273
I have. The noosphere isnt part of this
- 4,273
- 2,796
I was saying the low 1-C on the profiles varied far from your the supposed low 1-C justifications, and I haven't brought it up since. And for your first part, then you should know that it was evaluated as likely Low 1-C by Ultima and Agnaa.
- 61,134
- 14,630
- Thread starter
- #275
Cool, still not a part of this so please stop derailing
- 4,273
- 2,796
Your insistence on 5D noosphere not being apart of this thread, when I myself stated I agreed and only stated it to check what you said was true earlier in the thread. Please do not bring it up again unless you would like to reference your past statement. Also, that was not the point of my comment, don't dodge my intention and discredit it by calling it derailing, when you have referenced more than me at this point.
- 61,134
- 14,630
- Thread starter
- #277
Noosphere is not part of this thread. End of story.
- 4,273
- 2,796
Stop. Bringing. It. Up. If. It. Is. Not. Apart. Of. The. Thread.
This is hypocrisy Weekly, and anyway, still was not the bulk of my arguement.
This is hypocrisy Weekly, and anyway, still was not the bulk of my arguement.
- 61,134
- 14,630
- Thread starter
- #279
Dude. The Noosphere is not part of Yesod. This thread is solely about Yesod's structure, hence why its not part of it just like 4555 isnt part of it.
- 4,273
- 2,796
I get this. I do not bring it up. Please do not misinterpret my point on Noosphere when I have been clear on what it was. And if you bring it up and say it's derailing, and then continue to bring it up, it's hypocritical.
Similar threads
