• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Canonicity of RWBY x JL Crossover Comic

Status
Not open for further replies.
That isn't about the show referencing it.
From the post in question:

"On top of that, they directly interweave major points about the verse's lore into this story, such as Victor being the way that Remnant found out that Dust doesnt work outside the atmosphere by him being in a spaceship that exploded as it left the planet."

Yes, it is.
 
Honestly while I'm at it I'll check the guidebook when I get home as well, it most likely mentions the same event
 
There's literally no mention of the show referencing the comic in that quote.
 
it most likely mentions the same event
Unless it includes information that is exclusively from the comics, and not from the lore video, it won't help your argument whatsoever. The comic takes place in RWBY, it's expected to reference canon events. That doesn't make it canon.
 
It was literally the first thing I brought up lol


Literally my first major post on the thread that lead to this was addressing this
Weekly. This:
On top of that, they directly interweave major points about the verse's lore into this story, such as Victor being the way that Remnant found out that Dust doesnt work outside the atmosphere by him being in a spaceship that exploded as it left the planet.
Is absolutely not the same as:
the comic is directly referenced in the show
The event can't be referenced a year or so before actually happening.
 
Weekly. This:

Is absolutely not the same as:

The event can't be referenced a year or so before actually happening.
I need to check something, because the world of remnant came out in 2015 alongside the first season of the show
 
Weekly. This:

Is absolutely not the same as:

The event can't be referenced a year or so before actually happening.

Yeah no, the world of remnant series ran from 2014 to 2017, 4 to 7 years before this comic was published.

The episode in question was published in 2015, 6 years before this comic was published
 
Last edited:
So it's not referencing the comic. The comic references it. And it also isn't the show.
 
So it's not referencing the comic. The comic references it. And it also isn't the show.
The comic references the show, yes, just like every other canon extended media RWBY has

The World of Remnant is the show yes, it's quite literally an exposition dump for the verse's lore
 
The comic references the show, yes, just like every other canon extended media RWBY has

The World of Remnant is the show yes, it's quite literally an exposition dump for the verse's lore
Also wasn't Jeane in the world of Remnant in season 9? Or am I on drugs cause I haven't even touched season 9
 
Mind elaborating on this part further? Because I am under the impression that mini-series are indeed a show.
Yeah I'm not sure what he means by this either, the world of remnant as a series is an exposition dump of lore for the verse, and it was released alongside the show's episodes.

Saying the comic isnt canon because it's only referenced by the World of Remnant is like saying the Mandalorian isnt canon to Disney Star Wars because it's only ever brought up in Book of Boba Fett
 
You are proving the opponent's point, then.
Plus it's not like this is just some small reference. It's literally
*world of remnant: Atlas tried to launch someone into space and it failed, this was a history defining discovery that changed the understanding of how Dust works
*comic: cyborg was the astronaut, and his body is a direct result of this test
 
Aye, I would really point this out, it's a bit of false equivalence. (fallacy of false analogy)

You are using an analogy between two different situations

The Mandalorian is only referenced in the Book of Boba Fett does not necessarily mean that it is not canon to the Disney Star Wars verse. On the other hand, the status of the comic in the World of Remnant is dependent on the specific rules and definitions of the RWBY franchise canon, which may be different from other verses.
 
To be fair, wasn't World of Remnant retconned too at times? Specifically earlier episodes. Like, either the nature of grimm or aura?

But anyways World of Remnant can't be used to prove comic being canon, because it isn't in fact referenced in the show. So that point is void.
 
Mind elaborating on this part further? Because I am under the impression that mini-series are indeed a show.
It's not "the show." The primary canon is the actual RWBY series itself. When someone says it's referenced in the show, that means the actual RWBY series, not this mini series, which is extended media just like the movie and comics.
 
Saying the comic isnt canon because it's only referenced by the World of Remnant is like saying the Mandalorian isnt canon to Disney Star Wars because it's only ever brought up in Book of Boba Fett
That's not the argument being made. The only reason we're talking about this is because you lied about what happened. The comic wasn't referenced by World of Remnant. It was the opposite. World of Remnant was referenced by the comic. That doesn't mean it's canon.
 
To be fair, wasn't World of Remnant retconned too at times? Specifically earlier episodes. Like, either the nature of grimm or aura?

But anyways World of Remnant can't be used to prove comic being canon, because it isn't in fact referenced in the show. So that point is void.
Not that I'm aware of no, the guidebook even doubles down on the majority of info in the series
 
It's not "the show." The primary canon is the actual RWBY series itself. When someone says it's referenced in the show, that means the actual RWBY series, not this mini series, which is extended media just like the movie and comics.
Noted. I was a bit confused of your wording. Thanks for clarification.
 
That's not the argument being made. The only reason we're talking about this is because you lied about what happened. The comic wasn't referenced by World of Remnant. It was the opposite. World of Remnant was referenced by the comic. That doesn't mean it's canon.
I didnt lie though? Why does everyone always immediately jump the conclusion that any time I misspeak 8m automatically lying
 
I didnt lie though? Why does everyone always immediately jump the conclusion that any time I misspeak 8m automatically lying
Because what you said blatantly untrue, and it doesn't make any sense for it to be "misspeaking" because the truth (what you're claiming you 'meant') doesn't support your argument. You gain nothing by pointing out that the comic references a pre-existing lore event, so you had no reason to bring it up.

Clear as day, you attempted to pretend that the events of the comic were validated by other external media when it wasnt, and obviously the comic referencing the lore means nothing. Then you tried to misrepresent further by claiming the actual RWBY show referenced the comic, also untrue.
 
Because what you said blatantly untrue, and it doesn't make any sense for it to be "misspeaking" because the truth (what you're claiming you 'meant') doesn't support your argument.

Clear as day, you attempted to pretend that the events of the comic were validated by other external media when it wasnt, and obviously the comic referencing the lore means nothing. Then you tried to misrepresent further by claiming the actual RWBY show referenced the comic, also untrue.
The truth does support my argument, the comic took an event from the lore and expanded on it in a canon story
 
Not that I'm aware of no, the guidebook even doubles down on the majority of info in the series
Oh brooother, of course there's a guidebook.
I specifically vaguely remember Aura episode, which said something about Ozpin that later was retconned. Either his experience or mastery or something.
 
the comic took an event from the lore and expanded on it

That doesn't make it canon. The only justification you've provided for its canonicity in the first place is an author statement about an entirely different comic, made before the crossover was ever written. Which is another thing you got caught lying about
 
The truth does support my argument, the comic took an event from the lore and expanded on it in a canon story
Which doesn't help in our case. If a RWBY game says a story about how Adam got his SDC scar, expands on it, it doesn't help in its case of being possibly canon.

Weekly, for Christ you were a staff member, how can you not see it?
 
Oh brooother, of course there's a guidebook.
I specifically vaguely remember Aura episode, which said something about Ozpin that later was retconned. Either his experience or mastery or something.
Still not sure what you're referring to, if you could find it that would be great because I'm drawing a blank
 
That doesn't make it canon. The only justification you've provided for its canonicity in the first place is an author statement about an entirely different comic, made before the crossover was ever written. Which is another thing you got caught lying about
And why exactly does that make it non-canon? You keep saying that makes it non-canon but havent given an explanation as to why.
 
Weekly, for Christ you were a staff member, how can you not see it?
This is a bit topic-off, keep it outside the conversation if you don't mind.
The truth does support my argument, the comic took an event from the lore and expanded on it in a canon story
Elaborating upon an event derived from lore within a given context does not necessarily provide conclusive evidence of its canonical status within said context.
 
And why exactly does that make it non-canon? You keep saying that makes it non-canon but havent given an explanation as to why.
Expanding on an event from a lore in a story does not automatically make it canon because the canon status of a story or event within a lore is determined by the creators of that lore and their guidelines for what is considered canonical.

So unless the creator themselves created specific criteria for what they consider to be part of the official canon such as adherence to established lore, consistency with other canonical events, and endorsement by the creators themselves.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top