- 18,393
- 14,311
There are standards for it, pretty clear. This verse is not eligible. Apologies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are standards for it, pretty clear. This verse is not eligible. Apologies.
I think rance fits this criteria fine- Verses with shown or heavily descriptive sexual conduct. Said sexual content is not the main focus of the material and is usually part of a greater overall plot. Such content would be akin to an R-rated movie; restricted to mature audiences, but for wholly artistic endeavors.
And the verse is pretty much level 4, pretty much comparable to Monster Girl Quest.Verses classified as level 4, even with the option to display safe-for-work (SFW) content, will still not be allowed and will be treated the same as other level 4 content.
if it was truly level 4, fandom would not permit an alicesoft/rance wiki to be made. yet they did. but yeah, ill do that when i feel like itIt is level 4 and there is a note about it
And the verse is pretty much level 4, pretty much comparable to Monster Girl Quest.
Apologies, but this verse is on blocklist. Oh, btw you can always create a staff thread to ask about it.
That report would be laughed out instantly. You can't report someone for making a staff thread to get a verse approved. If you actually made that report, I would be tempted to report you for rvr misuse and get you threadbanned.Sure, let me know, so I can report it to RvR.
yep, its done, good luckw ith that thoughSure, let me know, so I can report it to RvR.
Oh, btw you can always create a staff thread to ask about it.
Tbh you are right, I only know that is centered around sex and rape and some fetish. Pretty much that, oh ya and the optional display with brings no relevance to the table. Not interested on negotiating with it.Dread you literally misrepresented Rance in the first place in your thread. You literally know nothing about the series and Rance is wholely irrelevant to that thread but put it as an example being unintentionally or intentionally dishonest (dunno which one but likely unintentionally due to lack of knowledge about the series).
Rance has no "optional display". It's just an eroge which has sexual content but has the story and world building as its main focus. It's not like MGQ where sex is intrinsic to both the combat and story.Tbh you are right, I only know that is centered around sex and rape. Pretty much that, oh ya and the optional display with brings no relevance to the table. Not interested on negotiating with it.
but that's clearly wrongTbh you are right, I only know that is centered around sex and rape and some fetish.
Were this not your argument? "that stuff is optional"Hate to somewhat hurt my case here but the better way to put it is "not necessary for the story" or "it can do without". Yea a lot of the stuff is optional but not all of it. The main point for addition is that the verse's nature is not pornographic as it can do without said content and that the story and gameplay is far more relevant than the sexual content as well as being an eroge which is a story based game that has sex in it rather than a nukige which is what MGQ is. Having sex is not an inherent disqualifier though and Celestial also agrees with that as well.
Fr, it is innocent plot and we all misjudging it, mhm. Anyway, there is no good grounds for discussing it here. If you feel you can convince staff members with it, be my guest. I am not interested on adding disgusting verses that support rape.but that's clearly wrong
There's no optional display setting but there's content that you can optionally access outside of the main story.Were this not your argument? "that stuff is optional"
Also you're cherry picking what I said.There's no optional display setting but there's content that you can optionally access outside of the main story.
Yea a lot of the stuff is optional but not all of it
You again misrepresent what I originally said. I'm not gonna bother arguing with you anymore.What is your point? It was the main argument that sex stuff was optional, now you changed it, it won't even make it better, but worse.
funnyrance was approved as level 3
3 years agofunny
I understood.3 years ago
also in the same thread MGQ is said to be level 3
until it wasn't later on
Optional display doesn't matter if it exists or not according to your own words though. This means ultimately nothing if the primary focus of the verse isn't sex and the presence of sex is not an automatic grounds for rejection.I mean, the staff thread already created as I suggested. No point in arguing, but all I want to say, even if you are now telling me there is no optional display on those stuff, you are not making your position greater to convince me, instead I will have a counter-argument that the verse indeed does not have optional display, and it will be more complicated.
Rejecting a verse full of rape and sex is for me at least a legitimate reason to reject it. Perhaps, not everyone has the same point of view.if the primary focus of the verse isn't sex and the presence of sex is not an automatic grounds for rejection.
Verses like The Boys, Game of Thrones, Original Tsukihime (which we indexed way before the remake), Redo of Healer, JK Haru, Devilman Crybaby and many many more exist (no setting to turn off explicit content). I'm not concerned at all. All that matters is if the verse's primary focus is sex or not (which it isn't)It actually matters, it was a strong argument that people won't need to witness those stuff while surfing the profiles or trying the game. It was perhaps the best argument in this thread till now.
And now that this concept does not even exist in the game, it make it harder to be accepted.
Having morally disgusting content is not grounds for rejection when you look at it from an objective point of view and the verses we currently allow.Rejecting a verse full of rape and sex is for me at least a legitimate reason to reject it. Perhaps, not everyone has the same point of view.
You can ask for permission for staff thread to argue allowing those stuffs. I don't mind it. I will just wish you all hope for having this type of discourse.
Let's agree to disagree. I think it is reasonable. Also, don't please use “objectivity” in this discussion, because if it was, you won't have created this thread to discuss the obvious, you would have created the profiles outright.Having morally disgusting content is not grounds for rejection when you look at it from an objective point of view and the verses we currently allow.
rance's genre is a jrpg tho, with erotic elementsNSFW is a genre, ya.
rance's genre is a jrpg tho, with erotic elements
Come again,Dread you literally misrepresented Rance in the first place in your thread. You literally know nothing about the series and Rance is wholely irrelevant to that thread but put it as an example being unintentionally or intentionally dishonest (dunno which one but likely unintentionally due to lack of knowledge about the series).
Come again,
who was being dishonest?