• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Establishing a Discussion Rule for MFTL Scaling

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chritin

He/Him
Messages
1,497
Reaction score
1,133
Permission for this post was granted by @Emirp sumitpo , and thank you to @M3X_2.0 for helping me write this up.

There are three things certain in JoJo scaling: 8-B denial, begging for Class G, and persistent MFTL downgrade attempts. Hopefully after this thread however, one of these constants may be rectified.

For nearly 10 years, we’ve seen roughly half a dozen separate threads attempting to downgrade the speed of MFTL characters. More than a decade later, none of those downgrade attempts have succeeded. While some of these are not fully rejected CRT's (some just died due to communal rejection), and some are questions where discussion and denial of the topic occurred, they are all valuable in representing how often this topic has been brough up and denied.
At some point, we need to acknowledge the pattern. What’s especially important here is that since the very first thread, the core arguments have remained virtually identical. The same misunderstandings keep resurfacing, particularly about how Stands function, and most notably how Silver Chariot operates. These aren’t new counterpoints or novel reinterpretations; they are reiterations of previously addressed misconceptions about Stand mechanics, range limitations, perception scaling, and interaction rules that have already been clarified multiple times. It becomes counterproductive when discussions keep resetting to square one because users misinterpret concepts that have long been explained. If an argument depends on fundamentally misunderstanding how Stands work, then it’s not a fresh challenge to the scaling, it’s just a repetition of an already resolved issue.

There has also been a recurring pattern of questionable interpretative standards being applied specifically to this verse. For example, a clear laser-dodging feat is dismissed as “aim-dodging,” despite the panels showing the character (Kars) still stationary while the beam is already visibly in front of him. That interpretation directly contradicts what is being depicted. If a character has not yet moved and the beam is already present in the frame in front of them, calling it aim-dodging requires ignoring the visual sequence entirely.

This is not about shielding a verse from criticism. It’s about maintaining consistency and preventing cyclical debates that reintroduce the same misunderstandings every few years. If a downgrade argument is going to be made, it needs to address the established explanations directly, not repackage previously debunked claims. As such, I among other have deemed it more than fitting that a discussion be made on this topic, which I have proposed bellow.
  • Do not attempt to holistically remove the existence of faster than light scaling from JoJo's Bizarre Adventure based on any perceived inconsistency or outliers with other feats within the verse. Multiple threads have been put forward over several years regarding this topic, and have been repeatedly rejected. The series possesses multiple, consistent faster than light feats and statements for multiple characters and stand abilities.
    • Do not attempt to remove or downgrade Polnareff's Stand Silver Chariot's second slicing of Hanged Man below Massively Faster than Light. This includes but is not limited to, arguing Polnareff's individual inability to track Hanged Man, arguing for anti-feats based on Silver Chariot's other showings, or arguing against Stand autonomy and User-to-Stand control. As covered in numerous discussion threads, Silver Chariot's Stand speed surpasses Polnareff's reactions - which is consistent with other Stand users across the series - and is blatantly able to blitz Hanged Man. This is also confirmed by the JoJo 6251 Databook which states that Silver Chariot is easily able to tag Speed of Light enemies, and supported by several accepted calculations.
So, let us leave this decade long Sisyphean discussion to rest. JoJo is FTL. Nuff said.

Agree: @Emirp sumitpo, @Planck69, @Dalesean027, @KingTempest, @Random-Helper323, @DarkDragonMedeus, @Damage3245, @Theglassman12, @KLOL506, @LephyrTheRevanchist

Disagree:
 
Last edited:
Looks fine to me, though I know Chariot said he and the other Jojo experts plan on making an entire blog about the speed feats for Jojo and explaining how they're not outliers. If and when they do get around to finishing that, we could add that into the discussion rule.
 
Looks fine to me, though I know Chariot said he and the other Jojo experts plan on making an entire blog about the speed feats for Jojo and explaining how they're not outliers. If and when they do get around to finishing that, we could add that into the discussion rule.
@Chariot190
 
Chritin is one of said "Experts", he's extremely reliable for the verses he partakes in.
Obviously I agree with Chritin's suggestion, and JoJo was 3rd in line for me anyway so the collective chat will probably end up doing it sometime after RE9 when we finish Part 3 (which is basically done, mostly calcs and verse blogs like this need is what's left to be done).
 
Chritin is one of said "Experts", he's extremely reliable for the verses he partakes in.
Obviously I agree with Chritin's suggestion, and JoJo was 3rd in line for me anyway so the collective chat will probably end up doing it sometime after RE9 when we finish Part 3 (which is basically done, mostly calcs and verse blogs like this need is what's left to be done).
Okay. That is good then.

Anyway, it seems like the suggested new rule has been accepted here. 🙏
 
Okay. That is good then.

Anyway, it seems like the suggested new rule has been accepted here. 🙏
Sounds good, and thank you all who responded.

The second part of the discussion rule needs links and sources in it for clarity.
I'll get those attached some time this afternoon.

Seems okay. There's a few grammar and spelling errors in the suggested rule though. That needs to be fixed.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was grammatically off. Just let me know the issues and I'll try and fix them up.
 
Grammar and spelling checked version:
  • Do not attempt to holistically remove the existence of faster than light scaling from JoJo's Bizarre Adventure based on any perceived inconsistency or outliers with other feats within the verse. The series possesses multiple, consistent faster than light feats and statements for multiple stands and characters.
    • Do not attempt to remove or downgrade Polnareff's Stand Silver Chariot's second slicing of Hanged Man below Massively Faster than Light. This includes but is not limited to, arguing Polnareff's individual inability to track Hanged Man, arguing for anti-feats based on Silver Chariot's other showings, or arguing against Stand autonomy and User-to-Stand control. As covered in numerous discussion threads, Silver Chariot's Stand speed surpasses Polnareff's reactions - which is consistent with multiple Stand users across the series - and is blatantly able to blitz Hanged Man. This is also confirmed by the JoJo 6251 Databook which states that Silver Chariot is easily able to tag Speed of Light enemies, and supported by several accepted calculations values.
 
Someone has also suggested that linking all the threads trying to downgrade the speed, the ones that are linked in the OP, would be useful for the rule.
I've added the necessary links and edited out the grammatical errors in the rule itself in the thread post. Just working on getting the proper evidence images for the final part of the sub-rule.
 
Okay. Is somebody here willing to apply the new rule please? 🙏
 
Can someone unlock the page real quick for me to add it, or can someone else add it?
 
Can someone unlock the page real quick for me to add it, or can someone else add it?

Unlocked. Remember to add this thread as the justification for the change. Let me know when its applied.
 

Unlocked. Remember to add this thread as the justification for the change. Let me know when its applied.
It is finished. Thank you all again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top