• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Team Fortress 2 - (tier 8 7 6 and Sol weapons speed upgrade and some other minor stuff)

It was 9-A because this wasn't even considered, and i doubt that he would have even bothered to do that considering that tf2 was struggling to get back to 9-A already.

There's literally nothing going against the idea that the Black box vaporized the tanks.

Why is a weapon in a set called "tank buster set" if it cannot bust tanks as it says (aka vaporization)
Besides, if it comes from the same advertisement, specifying that this set is used against tanks, why would the "opponents" mentioned not be tanks?
 
Actually why would a weapon be in the "tank buster set" if it can't do jackshit against tanks like it says?
That's not what my statement is trying to imply, but rather calling to question the necessity for this blurb to be saying that yes this weapon does indeed vaporize tanks when neither of the quotes provided say as much. Being a "tank buster" or "sending it back to their mothers" could be as minimal as putting a tank out of commission rather complete and total destruction.

I think the vaporization itself when killing the mercs is more or less for the "wow" factor because we have them tanking several hits beforehand.
If it's just wow factor, why are we attempting to use it for anything at all? You're just admitting then that it's just a gameplay mechanic.
 
That's not what my statement is trying to imply, but rather calling to question the necessity for this blurb to be saying that yes this weapon does indeed vaporize tanks when neither of the quotes provided say as much. Being a "tank buster" or "sending it back to their mothers" could be as minimal as putting a tank out of commission rather complete and total destruction.
I mean, if a weapon is meant to be used against a specific thing and it attacks via vaporizing stuff, then imo, it should be a fair assumption for it to be vaporizing that thing

Besides, this is probably just gonna be a likely or possibly rating anyway, it's not like we're definitely saying the Black Box vaporizes tanks, just that it probably does
 
If it's just wow factor, why are we attempting to use it for anything at all? You're just admitting then that it's just a gameplay mechanic.
Because it still happens outside of the mercs using it on each other.

Me saying it's just for wow-factor doesn't really make sense when I put it like that, and I don't even know what I was attempting to say there. Besides that wasn't the point of my comment. The point was if the vaporization weapons truly had that much higher output than the mercs durability, then why don't the mercs die after the first two shots? Or even the first shot?
 
That's not what my statement is trying to imply, but rather calling to question the necessity for this blurb to be saying that yes this weapon does indeed vaporize tanks when neither of the quotes provided say as much. Being a "tank buster" or "sending it back to their mothers" could be as minimal as putting a tank out of commission rather complete and total destruction.
Oh ok

If you really think about it "sending it back to their mothers" isn't really a term that implies that the tank will stay intact, it could be said as something more spiritual if you know what i mean.

Honestly what's stopping soldier to say that regardless od the state of the tank?

As for "tank buster set" i mean... yeah that's what it does i suppose, destroy tanks, it also doesn't necessarely implies that the tanks stay into an exactly full state.

Both really do imply that the tank isn't in the best of condition yes, but there isn't anything as direct like "blasted to Pieces"
 
I mean, if a weapon is meant to be used against a specific thing and it attacks via vaporizing stuff, then imo, it should be a fair assumption for it to be vaporizing that thing
Except in the case of the Black Box we cannot even discern how literal it's meant to be - it doesn't have the same kind of effect in-game as the energy weapons, nor is the blurb statement that explicit.

The point was if the vaporization weapons truly had that much higher output than the mercs durability, then why don't the mercs die after the first two shots?
Because that would be the requirement for something to be vaporized by said thing, to scale to it would indicate that you wouldn't have been vaporized in the first place.

Honestly what's stopping soldier to say that regardless od the state of the tank?
Which is my entire point, it's non-specific and vague.

Either way I've said my piece on this part of the subject, I don't agree to the mercs scaling to such things. If people want to discuss the Bread Monster thing they can because I haven't looked too far into that.
 
.. / - .... .. -. -.- / .. / .- --. .-. . . / .-- .. - .... / .- -... ... - .-. .- -.-. - .. --- -. ... / --- -. / - .... .. ... / ... - ..- ..-. ..-. .-.-.- / -. --- / .-. . .- .-.. / ..- ... . / .. -. / ..- ... .. -. --. / - .... .. -. --. ... / .-- . / -.-. .- -. -. --- - / -.-. --- -. ..-. .. .-. -- .-.-.-
 
Except in the case of the Black Box we cannot even discern how literal it's meant to be - it doesn't have the same kind of effect in-game as the energy weapons, nor is the blurb statement that explicit.
While I still do think it's vaporizing the tanks, I unfortunately have to concede that we simply don't have the evidence to back it up definitively, though I'd still like a possibility rating at least, since I still feel it's a safe assumption given the whole "smoldering pile of ash" thing
 
.. / - .... .. -. -.- / .. / .- --. .-. . . / .-- .. - .... / .- -... ... - .-. .- -.-. - .. --- -. ... / --- -. / - .... .. ... / ... - ..- ..-. ..-. .-.-.- / -. --- / .-. . .- .-.. / ..- ... . / .. -. / ..- ... .. -. --. / - .... .. -. --. ... / .-- . / -.-. .- -. -. --- - / -.-. --- -. ..-. .. .-. -- .-.-.-
why did you had to write that in morse code😭?
 
why did you had to write that in morse code😭?
.-- .... -.-- / .-- --- ..- .-.. -.. / .. / -. --- - / .-- .-. .. - . / .. - / .. -. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ..--.. / -.-. --- -- . / --- -. / -- .- -. --..-- / .. / .... .- ...- . / - --- / ..- ... . / ... --- -- . - .... .. -. --. / -.-- --- ..- / -. . . -.. / - --- / - .-. .- -. ... .-.. .- - . / .- - / .-.. . .- ... - / --- -. -.-. . / .- / -.-- . .- .-. --..-- / .- -. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . / .. ... / .- .-.. .-- .- -.-- ... / .- / --. --- --- -.. / --- .--. - .. --- -. -.-.--
 
.-- .... -.-- / .-- --- ..- .-.. -.. / .. / -. --- - / .-- .-. .. - . / .. - / .. -. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ..--.. / -.-. --- -- . / --- -. / -- .- -. --..-- / .. / .... .- ...- . / - --- / ..- ... . / ... --- -- . - .... .. -. --. / -.-- --- ..- / -. . . -.. / - --- / - .-. .- -. ... .-.. .- - . / .- - / .-.. . .- ... - / --- -. -.-. . / .- / -.-- . .- .-. --..-- / .- -. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . / .. ... / .- .-.. .-- .- -.-- ... / .- / --. --- --- -.. / --- .--. - .. --- -. -.-.--
mannn.... I'm om my phone i have to open vsbw from crome and it's sooo slowww...
 
.-- .... -.-- / .-- --- ..- .-.. -.. / .. / -. --- - / .-- .-. .. - . / .. - / .. -. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ..--.. / -.-. --- -- . / --- -. / -- .- -. --..-- / .. / .... .- ...- . / - --- / ..- ... . / ... --- -- . - .... .. -. --. / -.-- --- ..- / -. . . -.. / - --- / - .-. .- -. ... .-.. .- - . / .- - / .-.. . .- ... - / --- -. -.-. . / .- / -.-- . .- .-. --..-- / .- -. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . / .. ... / .- .-.. .-- .- -.-- ... / .- / --. --- --- -.. / --- .--. - .. --- -. -.-.--
u really couldn't speak something like italian couldn't you?
 
Well, given how someone asks "where are the tanks?", total destruction fits the bill a lot better.
hví skyldi ek auðvitað eigi
While I still do think it's vaporizing the tanks, I unfortunately have to concede that we simply don't have the evidence to back it up definitively, though I'd still like a possibility rating at least, since I still feel it's a safe assumption given the whole "smoldering pile of ash" thing
to everyone intrested for the black box feat, i will recontextualize what the burp says as there's direct connection between the feat and the black box statement (when i get home)
 
Last edited:
Basically.

We have a Soldier weilding the black box that is asked "where are the tanks?" and then admits to have destroyed said tanks, therefore the tanks were in such a state that they weren't even visible by people, and such description matches the "smouldering pile of ash" thing.

"Tank Buster set" and "sending back to their mother" isn't by any means a lenguage usage that would disqualify the "smouldering pile of ash" statement, as the the second one was said by Soldier who's a semplicistic moron in his lenguage behavior (also want to add that the term "sending back" or whatever is used also in other burps that imply the destruction or kill of someone not the dismissment) and the other is literally the description of the weapon.

In short, Soldier wields a weapon that it's stated to turn anything that is against in a "pile of smouldering ash", the lenguage used by Soldier himself is both non contradictiory with what the statement says and fits the tone of what the weapon is capable of.
 
Which is my entire point, it's non-specific and vague.

Either way I've said my piece on this part of the subject, I don't agree to the mercs scaling to such things. If people want to discuss the Bread Monster thing they can because I haven't looked too far into that.
Before taking this decision, you have to know that the term "Sending back to-" is used in other burps as to kill/destroy something rather than the dismissing or retiering.

Regardless, for soldier this is a war, why would he just "dismiss" out the tanks than destroing them totally?
 
Last edited:
Also i have to address another factor about the scaling you propose because:

1- The requierment to vaporize a mercenary is different than the vaporization of robots bacause the robots are weaker than the mercs, bacause:​
  1. The robots are weaker than the mercs, so the feat doesn't create no circular scaling.
  2. I will not stop repeating this till i'm dead, it takes multiple hits to kill a merc while 1 for a robot, taking a comment that Tllmbrg said.
Yah I don't think you can scale to something that just vaporizes you, it's like if we said humans are "At most 9-A" because that's how much it takes to vaporize us.
Yes Tllmbrg you are right, we don't get that rating because a human cannot survive the energy needed to vaporize another human.

HOWEVER, the feat i have presented today doesn't imply the vaporization of humans but robots, robots that the mercs downscale, and they not only have in game proof that they survive multiple shots in game but also implications in lore as rocket jumping is a common practice for soldier and other people in the verse and also in lore implication that people survive a shot from these weapons:

"Being an innovative hand-held irradiating utensil capable of producing rapid pulses of high-amplitude radiation in sufficient quantity as to immolate, maim and otherwise incapacitate the Irish."

2-Now that we know that ppl just that ppl are build like that in tf2, wouldn't say that the mercs don't scale to them be against the lore itself?​
3- Why would they even bother using other weaponry if you apparently just got a death cannon that canonically is as fast as light in your arsenal ?​
 
Last edited:
Actually, considering we are in theme of the ap for the mercs, i wanted to address something.

The earthquake we hear it's provably of magnitude 4 instead of 3.5.

Regardless that the marcally scale does make clear that the earthquake in question does have a lot of similarity with a 4.0 one.

For reference.

"Felt indoors by many" "Walls make a cracking sound" "Sensation like an heavy truck striking a building"


Not only that, but also based on 3d visual simulation the quake seems to be more violent than a 3.5 and more like a 4.0
 
Last edited:
It's a gameplay feat and it affects the mercs just as much as the robots, no? Weird to interpret it as "the mercs are canonically tanking it while the robots are canonically getting one-shot"
Sorry if i took a while to respond to you,

But technically no, the robots are considerably weaker than the mercs both because of upgrades (tecnically not only game mechanic as they were referenced in comics) and also Gray Mann had to take a complitly different approach in the war considering it was both causing another stalemate and was driving him bankrupt (due of the bots being powered by money).

It's not just a gameplay thing, the mercs are objectivly capable of dogging the robots with no difficulty.

Therefore the weapons aren't effecting them as much as the robots as they are one tapping them anyway.
 
Last edited:
Actually, considering we are in theme of the ap for the mercs, i wanted to address something.

The earthquake we hear it's provably of magnitude 4 instead of 3.5.

Regardless that the marcally scale does make clear that the earthquake in question does have a lot of similarity with a 4.0 one.

For reference.

"Felt indoors by many" "Walls make a cracking sound" "Sensation like an heavy truck striking a building"


Not only that, but also based on 3d visual simulation the quake seems to be more violent than a 3.5 and more like a 4.0
shit, forgot to reply, uh, agree with everything, though the 8-B+ stuff should be a likely or possibly since there's a bit of ambiguity with the tank statements
if you agree with this the calc gets at 8-B baselinei if i remember
 
Back
Top