- 10,079
- 3,445
The explanation given ia that it has 3 sunsQuickly explain why Namek is always day time, it might be important.
......so, ig it makes them orbit the planet? Not sure tbh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The explanation given ia that it has 3 sunsQuickly explain why Namek is always day time, it might be important.
There are 3 suns that go around in circles constantly if I'm not mistakenQuickly explain why Namek is always day time, it might be important.
I Guess? Sorry, could you rephrase that a little?Uh huh, that's what I thought, so, would that not imply that between the 3 suns, Namek always has a sun facing one side of the planet, kinda like a triangle, with Namek in the center, that way, regardless of orbit, light is always hitting each part of Namek, thus, it is always day, yeah?
Yeah, to some degree. You can also see all 3 Suns from a single given side, though, so not probably not nearly as cleanly as you’re imagining.Uh huh, that's what I thought, so, would that not imply that between the 3 suns, Namek always has a sun facing one side of the planet, kinda like a triangle, with Namek in the center, that way, regardless of orbit, light is always hitting each part of Namek, thus, it is always day, yeah?
So akin to this? 3 suns, shining on the planet in such a way it's always day, at various depths and angles so the planet, orbit or not is catching light?
In which case, Idk which, but one of these suns must be in the foreground, based on how we know Namek's 3 suns and day/night cycle to work.
Top right seems to be further back given it's drawn smaller, and at that angle, the whole backside would be lit up, so ok.
That means one of the two near the bottom is in front of, or at least parallel with, Namek, which in turn means, Namek is ******* huge, like goddamn ******* massive.kinda like kaioshin planet
I did not check any other scans or shots, idk if it is drawn like this beyond this one shot, it might be a one off inconsistent panel that can't be used, idk. But at least, in this specific panel, Namek was drawn bigger than a small sun, and ya'll should look into if it is drawn like this at least a few more times and if it's consistent.
and now that I planted the seeds of discord I shall slip away :HappyFrug:
In which case, Idk which, but one of these suns must be in the foreground, based on how we know Namek's 3 suns and day/night cycle to work.
Top right seems to be further back given it's drawn smaller, and at that angle, the whole backside would be lit up, so ok.
That means one of the two near the bottom is in front of, or at least parallel with, Namek, which in turn means, Namek is ******* huge, like goddamn ******* massive.kinda like kaioshin planet
I did not check any other scans or shots, idk if it is drawn like this beyond this one shot, it might be a one off inconsistent panel that can't be used, idk. But at least, in this specific panel, Namek was drawn bigger than a small sun, and ya'll should look into if it is drawn like this at least a few more times and if it's consistent.
and now that I planted the seeds of discord I shall slip away :HappyFrug:
If I was, I would've checked every panel myself, but that's effort I could be using to, idk, do non-DBZ related things. instead, I'm just going "hey, this panel exists, aint that funny?", and telling you lads to figure it out if it's consistent.
Knowing how ya'll act, I expect a verdict within a day.
Interesting if Nanek is that big.Namek is massive omg
It's kinda useless but heres every appearance of planet Namek in manga.
The 8 is one of the star of planet Namek and the 9 is the destruction of planet namek.
I have time to waste lol I managed to find it in color.
just, it's in French
I do, looks 50/50. Some shots identical, some not.Personally I don't see a lot of useful consistency in the pics there for detirmining Namek's size.
Supreme Kai planet has stars orbiting it explicitly, and Mr. Satan is just fine.(And if we're being the teensiest bit realistic, a bigger-than-stars sized Namek would have enough gravity to crush Bulma flat)
They had an interview with an expert.Also like, DBZ dog, we got a planet the size of my backyard with 10g, apparently an average planet eclipses earth yet most we know have 1g gravity bar plane vegeta, namek having 3 suns in and of itself doesnt make sense given how orbits work and suns work, like, if namek is a normal planet, that means it's orbiting a sun, in which case, it cant have a complete day cycle as it'd move out of the position of other suns as it moves along one of the three. That, or Namek would be torn apart by having 3 suns gravitational pull constantly pulling at it each as it attempts to orbit them.
Tbh the more I think about it, the more I'm like what if the suns orbit Namek, not Namek orbiting them? Would unironically make the most sense and align with several shots
I considered this as well, couldn't its GBE be high enough that it can withstand 3 suns pulling it in different directions?Not withstanding his opinion ultimately aint canon at all and thus, ultimately ain't usable as evidence for, or against.
"—Oh, so there are worlds like Planet Namek out there! Because of all those suns it never gets dark on Planet Namek, but is that part realistic, too?
Sekine: Oh, that aspect is a bit far-fetched on a physical level. In systems with more than one sun, the smaller suns always orbit the largest sun.
Furthermore, the planets in that system would then orbit the suns, so no matter how many suns there are, the planets would still experience night at some point."
Does corroborate with what I was saying, it would actually be impossible as it would experience night eventually due to orbiting one such sun, that, or torn apart if each sun is equally contributing, kinda leading to, what if the suns orbit Namek instead? Kinda unrealistic but the very premise is, and when we have wild shit like the supreme kai planet which is asinine, idk, maybe.
Personally im 50/50, maybe as a high end? Like "possibly"? But then again, idk if this would even affect anything except Moro, who's like, low 2-C or some shit, shit like Frieza nuking the core or tanking it might not be calculable if we don't know how big said core is, or how close to the epicenter he was.
Nah, because at that point, the suns themselves still have to move.I considered this as well, couldn't its GBE be high enough that it can withstand 3 suns pulling it in different directions?
Tbh not really, it'd just be a huge af planet we can pixel scale directly off of. I mean it'd be weird, but DBZ has worse shit so shrug.The option of the suns orbitting around it, would just make it even weirder to calculate
So in the end, they'd still be orbitting round itNah, because at that point, the suns themselves still have to move.
Based on its gravity, its not super denseTbh not really, it'd just be a huge af planet we can pixel scale directly off of. I mean it'd be weird, but DBZ has worse shit so shrug.
Yes, restore the Universes AFTER they got erased by Zeno, what don't qualifies as in-wiki definition of restorationC17 only uses the term "restore" which could perfectly match the ability used by the wiki
if he could actually recreate the universes from scratch, it would give him many more abilities.
that does make sense and the planet is probably tidally locked as well although such planets shouldn’t be able to survive normallyUh huh, that's what I thought, so, would that not imply that between the 3 suns, Namek always has a sun facing one side of the planet, kinda like a triangle, with Namek in the center, that way, regardless of orbit, light is always hitting each part of Namek, thus, it is always day, yeah?