Durability Page Update (Staff Only)

[Damage3245]

Sandbox needs to be updated to expand on the surviving attacks section, possibly a section for video game mechanics. Possibly more modifications, unsure yet.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I also think the points about melee weapons where if they're examples of AP coming from the weapon rather than the wielder, I could see how durability wouldn't scale to the wielder. But for cases where a striking strength clearly comes from the wielder rather than the weapons, (which is still most melee weapon cases from my experience) then it shouldn't be treated any differently than characters punching.

 

[Antvasima]

Sandbox needs to be updated to expand on the surviving attacks section, possibly a section for video game mechanics. Possibly more modifications, unsure yet.

Okay. Thank you for the reply.

 

[Agnaa]

Bump.

 

[Damage3245]

Bump.

My bad, been a bit busy focusing on other things.

But sandbox is open for staff to edit if anyone wants to edit specific points.

 

[Antvasima]

The sandbox looks good to me, but I am not the best person to ask. Could somebody write a tally of the staff opinions here so far please?

 

[Antvasima]

The sandbox looks good to me, but I am not the best person to ask. Could somebody write a tally of the staff opinions here so far please?

@Agnaa @DarkDragonMedeus @Damage3245 @Duedate8898 @KLOL506 @Antoniofer @LordGriffin1000 @GyroNutz @Qawsedf234 @KingTempest @Emirp sumitpo @Nehz_XZX @UchihaSlayer96 @Sir_Ovens @Colonel_Krukov

Is the sandbox draft fine to apply now?

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

It looks good to me

 

[Damage3245]

Sandbox hasn't really been updated; if there are points people want to modfiy on it, the sandbox is open for edits.

 

[KLOL506]

I got nothing to add.

 

[Colonel_Krukov]

Looks good.

Spock and I think Vulcans in general use pressure points a lot.

Also, maybe worth covering game mechanics? Specifically health bars, chip damage, weak spots etc.

I can add the example myself, but I think there should be a section that briefly covers, and links to, game mechanics.

 

[Antvasima]

I can add the example myself, but I think there should be a section that briefly covers, and links to, game mechanics.

What do the rest of you think about this?

 

[KLOL506]

What do the rest of you think about this?

I think @DarkDragonMedeus would be best able to explain this, but honestly I can't think of anything worth explaining that isn't already explained in the Game Mechanics page itself, at best a link redirect to the Game Mechanics page under the Notes section should do IMHO.

 

[Antvasima]

That seems fine to me at least.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I feel like the game mechanics page already does enough explaining and that a simple redirect while briefly mentioning game mechanics would be enough to add.

 

[Antvasima]

Yes, agreed.

 

[KingTempest]

I assisted in like 60% of the sandbox. I'm not really the best one to evaluate it. It's like a CGM evaluating their own calc.

 

[Colonel_Krukov]

Agreed with KLOL and DDM

 

[Damage3245]

Okay, added a note linking to the Game Mechanics page.

 

[KLOL506]

Is there anything else left to add?

 

[Antvasima]

I do not know. I was personally fine with the draft the last time that I checked, but further input would be appreciated.

 

[Qawsedf234]

I think its fine to post.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for the evaluation. I think that you can probably post the new draft for our durability page then, @Damage3245 .

Is that fine with you as well, @DontTalkDT ?

 

[GyroNutz]

Draft looks fine to me

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for the reply.

 

[Damage3245]

Okay. Will update the durability page then.

Further modification are always possible later on.

 

[Antvasima]

Yes. Thank you very much for helping out. It is appreciated.

 

[Damage3245]

Done. This could be closed now.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you to everybody who helped out here.