Infinite 4-D power = Infinite 5-D power = High 2-A???

[Azathoth_the_Abyssal_Idiot]

Raidou should be on par with Hitoshura (aka Demi-Fiend), so yes.

 

[Naitez]

For the guy editing the Spectre, take out the fact that he was badly outmatched by the five dimensional imps repeatedly. It's fairly obvious anyway.

 

[Antvasima]

I think that one mention about it should stay.

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

I think that one mention about it should stay.

the note?


anyway, the high 2-A ranking came from being scalled from anti monitor who is itself now at 2-A

 

[CrossverseCrisis]

I think that one mention about it should stay.

Crap. I'll rollback that edit of mines i just did then....

 

[Azathoth_the_Abyssal_Idiot]

anyway, the high 2-A ranking came from being scalled from anti monitor who is itself now at 2-A

Fixed it, already.

 

[Antvasima]

@TLT1 The mention that the 5-D imps repeatedly badly outmatched the Spectre.

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

@TLT1 The mention that the 5-D imps repeatedly badly outmatched the Spectre.

someone took care of that before i cud

 

[Antvasima]

Okay then.

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

can anyone who knows about problem sleuth tell me whetherthis profile is correct?

 

[Basilisk1995]

We don't have any High 2-B.So, the High part should be gone.I can't say anything more as I don't know about the character.

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

imma wait to be sure

 

[Azathoth_the_Abyssal_Idiot]

I do. It's correct, but since we don't have high 2-B, it should be changed to "At least 2-B, likely higher".

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

Update: I have looked at 2-As up to and including page 18 of tier

I should be done with all of it today

 

[Antvasima]

Fodderising somebody with 10^100 times universal power, as I think Mobster Kingpin did, is not anywhere near enough to qualify for "At least 2-B" or even "High 2-B"

 

[Azathoth_the_Abyssal_Idiot]

Fodderising somebody with 10^100 times universal power, as I think Mobster Kingpin did, is not anywhere near enough to qualify for "At least 2-B" or even "High 2-B"

That was Black Hole Mobster Kingpin. Problem Sleuth fodderised Demonhead Mobster Kingpin, who absorbed Black Hole Mobster Kingpin (who he was already vastly stronger than) and multiplied his power by an untold amount.

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

this profile says the character can transcend infinite worlds, so does that go under At least 2-A?


also for this profile , is it ok for the charcater to be multiversal+, and have universal+ dura

 

[CrossverseCrisis]

For the first one, Tribunal? That one was done by Darkness552 (AFAIK). I'm not sure what to make up of it since the recent changes for the 2-A tiers + Darkness is not around to help modify it or whatever....

 

[Mandrakk_The_Dark_Monitor]

For being that can destroy and exist outside infinite universes (2-A) shouldn't it be High 2-A?

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

For being that can destroy and exist outside infinite universes (2-A) shouldn't it be High 2-A?

a being that destroys infinite universes is 2-A

 

[CrossverseCrisis]

Yeah that sounds more like a 2-A feat. Going by the image link that explains Sigma's tier, i don't get the implication that he became High 2-A.

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

what about this one ?

should AP be changed to Multiversal, possibly Multiversal+ ?

 

[CrossverseCrisis]

Ooooo, idk anything about Elder Scrolls. Azathoth might possibly answer to that one, however.......

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

well thats the only profile remaining to be covered

 

[Antvasima]

@Azathoth Well, to qualify for 2-A, a character must be 10^400 times stronger than Black Hole Mobster Kingpin. I doubt that the power-up was that great.

@TLT1 Please bold the text in the following manner when making edits. Thank you.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/index....action=historysubmit&diff=417950&oldid=417809

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

@Azathoth Well, to qualify for 2-A, a character must be 10^400 times stronger than Black Hole Mobster Kingpin. I doubt that the power-up was that great.
@TLT1 Please bold the text in the following manner when making edits. Thank you.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/index....action=historysubmit&diff=417950&oldid=417809

ok

 

[Antvasima]

Thanks.

 

[Faisal_Shourov]

So everything is sorted out ?

 

[Antvasima]

Well, except that certain profiles now have too much bolded text, I suppose so.

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

Well, except that certain profiles now have too much bolded text, I suppose so.

the text can be fixed in regular edits

but, there is one profile left: Y'ffre- which is listed as 2-B, possibly 2-A, while his DC is at Multiversal+ and I am unsure about what to do

 

[Antvasima]

Well, if it contains half of the timelines within itself, and there are an infinite number of timelines, I suppose that 2-A seems appropriate.

 

[The_Living_Tribunal1]

Well, if it contains half of the timelines within itself, and there are an infinite number of timelines, I suppose that 2-A seems appropriate.

so, can I remove the 2-B ranking?

 

[Antvasima]

I think so, but it is probably best to ask in this thread first.

 

[BeatrixNexus]

What if a character was able to create/destroy a universe that contains an infinite amount of space and time? Would that be low 2-C or 2-A on the basis of having infinite 4-D power? Also, wouldn't multiversal branches exist in 5-D space?

 

[Antvasima]

We tend to avoid hypothetical situations, and deal with what has actually been presented within various fictions, but you can ask DarkLK about the infinite 4-D example.

As for multiversal branches, as far as I understand, yes the 4-D continuums are aligned with each other along a 5-Dimensional axis, but only an unfathomably narrow one would be required. Hence, we rate proper 5-D characters higher.

 

[BeatrixNexus]

Sorry for posting on this again but don't a lot of fictional universes have infinite time? There are probably dozens of stories where the heat death of the universe happens, it would take infinite time for the universe to reach absolute zero temperature. What about universes where time is finite, does that mean destroying 10 quadrillion years worth of spacetime is equivalent to 10 trillion years?

Also, if you think this is too arbitrary, you've accepted the speculation that there are 10^500 universes AND that there are 10-11 dimensions in a standard multiverse, things that are only in string theory, while the heat death of the universe is a very likely event, being the most accepted possible end of the universe by science because of observations pointing to a topologically flat, zero-energy universe. Destroying our timeline in real life would likely destroy an infinite amount of time.

 

[Mandrakk_The_Dark_Monitor]

That's irrelevant and doesn't get anything done. Not to mention confusing.

It's not about what's "true" or not, it's what makes hierarchical sense.