- 1,558
- 345
NOTE: My issue here isn't with characters claiming to be infinitely above 2-C not being classified as 2-A. My issue is with the phrasing of the note completely contradicting math.
The first note of the Tiering System claims, "Due to the fact that the distance between any given number of universes embedded in higher-dimensional / higher-order spaces is currently unknowable, it is impossible to quantify the numerical gap between each one of the subtiers in Tier 2. As such, it is not allowed to upgrade such a character based solely on multipliers. For example, someone twice as strong as a Low 2-C character would still be Low 2-C, and someone infinitely more powerful than a 2-C would not be 2-A.", of which the latter is, mathematically, false, as any 2-C, by definition, has already bridged one of those gaps. Unless there's reason to assume that any gaps the 2-C hasn't already bridged is 2-A (or bigger) in size, which, unless specifically stated/shown to be the case, would be jumping to unfounded conclusions contrary to the available evidence, then due to the infinite multiplier in place here, any finite (from a Tier 2 perspective) gap may as well equal zero.
To demonstrate mathematically, we need 3 variables:
S = The power of the character, measured in spacetime continuums (let's go with a baseline of 2 here).
G = The gap between each spacetime continuum, measured in the size of spacetime continuums.
I = Infinity.
Regardless of if you check if S*G < S*I or calculate S*G*I and regardless if G = 5, or G = 52!*101010100! (or any other finite value), the result is infinite spacetime continuums. In fact, the rest of the formula may as well not be there in the first place.
If you wanna argue that the gaps, themselves, are infinite, then I will have to ask how come the 2-C isn't 2-A to begin with? And, again, that will let our character infinitely above said character cross infinity infinite gaps.
In summary: The argument presented in the note is the 4D equivalent of claiming that a character infinitely above a 3-B isn't High 3-A, because we don't know the distance between galaxies outside of the observable universe.
Also, since this may apparently be needed: In a simplified explaination, character A has crossed the gap between spacetime continuums once. Character B is infinitely above character A in every way. Character B can cross an infinitely larger gap, or any gap the same size or finitely larger, an infinite number of times.
The first note of the Tiering System claims, "Due to the fact that the distance between any given number of universes embedded in higher-dimensional / higher-order spaces is currently unknowable, it is impossible to quantify the numerical gap between each one of the subtiers in Tier 2. As such, it is not allowed to upgrade such a character based solely on multipliers. For example, someone twice as strong as a Low 2-C character would still be Low 2-C, and someone infinitely more powerful than a 2-C would not be 2-A.", of which the latter is, mathematically, false, as any 2-C, by definition, has already bridged one of those gaps. Unless there's reason to assume that any gaps the 2-C hasn't already bridged is 2-A (or bigger) in size, which, unless specifically stated/shown to be the case, would be jumping to unfounded conclusions contrary to the available evidence, then due to the infinite multiplier in place here, any finite (from a Tier 2 perspective) gap may as well equal zero.
To demonstrate mathematically, we need 3 variables:
S = The power of the character, measured in spacetime continuums (let's go with a baseline of 2 here).
G = The gap between each spacetime continuum, measured in the size of spacetime continuums.
I = Infinity.
Regardless of if you check if S*G < S*I or calculate S*G*I and regardless if G = 5, or G = 52!*101010100! (or any other finite value), the result is infinite spacetime continuums. In fact, the rest of the formula may as well not be there in the first place.
If you wanna argue that the gaps, themselves, are infinite, then I will have to ask how come the 2-C isn't 2-A to begin with? And, again, that will let our character infinitely above said character cross infinity infinite gaps.
In summary: The argument presented in the note is the 4D equivalent of claiming that a character infinitely above a 3-B isn't High 3-A, because we don't know the distance between galaxies outside of the observable universe.
Also, since this may apparently be needed: In a simplified explaination, character A has crossed the gap between spacetime continuums once. Character B is infinitely above character A in every way. Character B can cross an infinitely larger gap, or any gap the same size or finitely larger, an infinite number of times.
