• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

[MINOR] Mission: Yozakura Family - Kyoichiro's threads are smaller than you thought

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
5,863
Reaction score
3,520
So heres a new accepted calc


And this gets the thickness of Steel Spider at 0.2265μm aka Small Size Type 4. Currently Kyoichiro's threads are only rated as Small Size type 3 with no hard value based on too small for the naked eye to see statements and feats accepted in prior revisions.
So Kyoichiro's small size attacks will be type 4 now. This value will also be added into Blooming Micro Vision justifications as that scales off Steel Spider threads.

Next. Kyoichiro should get limited durability negation with his thread shields. As Kyoichiro stated Asa would disintegrate if he took one step further into his thread shield. Along with that FSS (Hissing SFX) thats indicative of something being vaporized or damaged at the very least. A similar sound effect was used when Taiyo vaporized an enemy. And just as importantly Asa is Low 7-B while that Kyoichiro (Pre-Timeskip) is a Low 7-C. Plus Asa actually respected the threat and talked instead of just walking further


Ok thats it. Very brief really
 
Last edited:
The calculation is fine if it's accepted. The limited durability negation seems alright, but I'd much prefer if there was an explained mechanism for it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top