OrangeFR
Username Only- 1,711
- 1,029
I mean the wiki has this as the definition of ED: “Environmental Destruction describes a character's capability to damage and destroy an area around themselves, but not necessarily their capacity to realistically harm their opponent”. I am now rethinking my position, it doesn’t seem to be ED, but it definitely is not direct AP and would be an overtime hax thing.Wait, wait, it says "passive." Do we agree that means without direct offensive intent? So it doesn't include active, directed, or deliberately destructive phenomena.
That's the boundary between ED and DC/AP. Right?