• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports - 17

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'll give him a warning about dropping the Saitama is star level thing.

If he doesn't stop he is a troll
 
I think that you can ban him. He seems too disrespectful to work as a member of this community.
 
Can we wait to see if he listen to/ignore my warning first? If he keeps being disrespectful I fully agree with banning him
 
@Joseph

It's insta-ban worthy only if you say that he is omnipotent/limitless/can't lose.

There is a discussion rule about not upgrading him to Star level but it isn't something ban-worthy
 
Also, whoever has been uploading pornography seems to be from Australia going by his xvideos profile.
 
They probably wouldn't be on this Wiki, or was a member at one point.
 
Thank you for helping out with cleaning them up.

Do you think that we should give him a block, and if so, for how long?
 
At least 2 months; he's been banned before for a year, but was unblocked. A total served ban time of about 4 months, but if he did more profiles, prolly much longer than this. Although he said "ok i understand" to my final warning, I doubt he'll listen, knowing him.
 
In my opinion since we gave him one last warning, it is only fair to see if he abides by it.

We should keep our eyes on him but it would be a bit unfair to feign giving him another chance and then ban him anyway.

If, or when, he breaks that warning's agreement, then a ban is in order.
 
Okay. I suppose that we should probably wait and see if he follows your instructions first then.
 
Think we can go with that. Wait and see what his next profile will be, and if he flunks again, it's the timeout corner.
 
I have blocked Mewtwo54, given that he ignored the previous warning.
 
@Mewtwo since when have anyone of these staff members have ever been on their high horses, all they've done is give a guy who made bad profiles a warning.
 
That's a pretty harsh insult, too. Either a final warning or a bad imo. Although even if we give him a warning he'll probably just curse out the one who gives the warning.
 
Telling me to frick frack off and grow some brain cells really isn't all that harsh. It's like, 5th grade stuff.

But anyways yeah it does disrupt the friendly environment and there can't be much good to come from a user like that. I just find the amount of confidence some people get from hiding behind a computer screen hilarious.
 
I always got the impression DuckTales is really, really young given how hard he's trying to push profiles for an obscure Nick sitcom to be made despite no one here apparently knowing much about it. Given his rude behavior, I think a 3 month ban is fair.
 
You can do so, yes. Just remember to check the box that prevents him from posting on his message wall as well.
 
That's not what the rule violation thread is for.

Unsatisfied with the page? You should make a CRT
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top