- 5,029
- 1,325
Oh, I thought Immeasurable was moving across time with speed.
Idk anymore.
Idk anymore.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Considering it allows you to hurt your opponent's past and future self by hitting them in the present, it's a little more busted than basic rangeIt's just range
What does it look like on a profile? I don't think I've seen it before. Is it like:Yeah, but still falls into the "range" category
I do believe in it, yes, however I don't see the staff accepting it, the only conclusion I see is either removing canon abilities or offering an explanation that doesn't do that, I do agree with immesurable but I do not see the staff accepting it seeing how close minded they are that their interpretation can go above canon factsHey, user. I'm sorry to ask, but, do you not believe in immeasurable anymore? You mentioned you wanted to offer a solution, which as type 2 acausality, if I'm correct.
but I do not see the staff accepting it seeing how close minded they are that their interpretation can go above canon facts
I did the best with the time I had. I read and re-read my post multiple times to be absolutely sure people weren't confused by the wording in my big ass paragraph on a surprisingly complex and contreversial topic involving flying golden hedgehogsThat was a poorly organized paragraph structure.
You say it's been discussed multiple times but I still haven't seen a good example of one these discussions, and the only argument I've seen that says temporal omnipresence accross all of time doesn't grant immeasurable speed is when you say said said something along the lines of "Just because someone has large size doesn't mean they get a speed ranking proportional to that size". I understand that this was only an example, and (hopefully) not the entire basis for your argument, but temporal omnipresence and large size aren't even similar at a conceptual level. A large character can have the reaction time of a regular human even if they're the size of a galaxy. It's even logical for them to be SLOWER than a regular human due to thier absurd mass being impossibly difficult to move by thier own muscles. That's actually the reason the most massive animals on Earth are underwater. So yeah, if anything, large size is a detriment to speed if we use real life logic, but temporal omnipresence is different. Solaris occupies about as much space as a building physically, but across time, he's everywhere, and that's a BIG difference. Let's say you're in front of Solaris, and in rapid successions, you constantly travel between random time periods in quick successions, (just like an immeasurable character would), while observing Solaris clapping his hands for example. His clapping motion would remain fluid and consistant to you, and he would be able to see you travelling through those time periods just as fluidly and consistantly, because he's practically one with time. The amount of space he occupies is irrelevant, because what matters is how temporal omnipresence affects his movements and perceptions. As for the barrier, that's exactly my point. It proves temporal AoE is an abillity that they have, and I'm glad we can agree on that much. Solaris shouldn't even need to move to block Sonic's attacks since his barriers should be covering him at all times, and his core should always be shielded by his back as Solaris can be seen rotating all throughout the fight. So far, it sounds like the Super forms' AoE is much more powerful than Solaris's omnipresence since they can essentially nullify it, but then you realize that Solaris can still block thier attacks with his barriers IF he manages to get it up in time. He can still till hit them with his attacks IF they don't react fast enough. Solaris' speed and reaction time is still something the hedgehogs need to invest effort into to overcome, which makes sense since immeasurable speed, temporal omnipresence, and AoE are mutually intertwined by Solaris's super-dimensional physiology. When you think about it, those 3 powers are just really similar in many ways. In fact, the reason that Super forms can hurt someone through every point in time is because time is but another direction they can travel through. It all just falls into place perfectly. This is even supported by them travelling to the past and future before the fight when standard FTL travel has never allowed them do that in the series without the aid of time travel panels. I also think it's wierd how dodging Solaris' attacks no longer counts as immeasurable because it's impossible even for immeasurable characters. If anything, doesn't that make it even more impressive? If Solaris was omnipresent across every point in time except for the earliest past and the latest future, the Super forms would be considered immeasurable for being able to dodge his attacks by moving from the beginning of time to the end of it with raw speed, but since Solaris exists in every point in time without exception, making the scaling more impressive, they're just MFTL+, which makes absolutely no sense.But none of that is legit Immeasurable speed; it's already been discussed multiple times it doesn't require Immeasurable speeds to fight someone with temporal omnipresence. And the barrier argument really isn't speed at all but AoE. "Solaris doesn't need to physically move to black Sonic's assault" that's not speed at all but just passively blocking it; which is not reactions at all.
Can you tell me the difference between a character who can freely roam accross linear time (which is grounds for immeasurable speed), and a character who is fast enough to consistantly blitz someone who is already present across all of time? No matter which conclusion we draw, this should help clear things up.Having "Temporal omnipresence" is a different ability altogether and doesn't mean anything speed wise. And the rest is still just redundancy, the core argument is still requiring an attack with temporal omnipresent AoE.
That's what we've been doing from the start and it's getting us nowhere. We're already at page 8 of this thread. We need to look at the bigger picture if we want to settle this for real.What I meant is instead of writing everything up in a single uber paragraph, why not make multiple paragraphs you would typically write if English class assignment. It's a lot easier to read and separate points bit by bit that way.
Just because many franchises screw up the logistics of temporal omnipresence doesn't mean we should throw every feat under the bus, especially those who have pretty solid backbone to them and pretty much no contradictions.But anyway, Omnipresence is just such a commonly status in fiction, and it's super common for omnipresent foes to be defeated by protagonists with finite speeds.
So is this the difference that I asked you to specify in my last post? I don't get it. All I see when I read this is "Immeasurable characters need to physically move in order to be beyond linear time, while Solaris doesn't even need to lift a finger"Furthermore, a character absolutely needs to be 100% active in order to be truly Immeasurable. They need reflexes that are faster than instantaneous to truly be Immeasurable. But omnipresence or more passive rather than active.
I'd have to see an example of this to see how it compares to what we're currently discussing.And even characters who are omnipresent across space have thrown attacks that strike periods in time that can be avoided by those with finite speed.
I actually agree in the sense that space-omnis should tie in a race againsts someone with infinite speed. Time-omnis like Solaris are the same, but with Immeasurables. This makes more sense when you keep in mind that space is a 3D concept, while time is a 4D one. Let's compare the benefits of infinite speed to those of space omnipresence to paint a clearer picture and then we'll get to the part where we start to disagree.Being omnipresent across time being qualified as Immeasurable is no different then just making characters with spatial omnipresence infinite speed or that it takes 0 seconds for me to travel from point A to point B because someone has a length of line AB.
It is, actually. If you attack him in the present (whatever "your" present may be), Solaris would be able to see exactly what you, and every other living thing that ever was in his line of sight, is up to. He would know what they've done, what they're doing , and what they will do in that place. He'll know what your exact intentions are in less than an instant before you know it yourself, and yeet a meteor at your past, present and future self all at once. Unless you're immeasurable AND capable of hitting someone through multiple points in time, how do you stand a chance against him?It's proof they can reach things passively or instantly by nature that they're already their, but it's no proof they actively had a brain that processed in negative 0 seconds.
I've proven my positive so the ball is in your courtThere's just too many negatives to prove, and asking why it's not Immeasurable speed is asking me to prove a negative.
Except we clearly see that Solaris's attacks are in every point in time at once when you switch to a character in a different time period, and Solaris would have to be really stupid to just attack and at one point in time when he exists in all of them. The same can be said for other omnipresent characters who attack in only one spot, but again, I haven't seen any example and we can't disregard every feat involving omnipresence just because some writers don't know how it specifically works. I can't believe I'm saying this, but Sonic 06's writers somewhat succeeded where many others failed.There needs to be spatial distance divided by time as moving 0 distance in 0 or negative time is inapplicable. There needs to be proof that distance was traveled, and being omnipresent usually creates even more burden of proof when it comes to Immeasurable speed. Because a character who is omnipresent would just attack a specific period in time and space; there's no travel or muzzle velocity; just an attack with an already there starting point.
In a sense, I agree. Of course, it's important that those in favor of immeasurable should still debate in favor of their side, but we've been doing that, and I feel we've provided really good pieces of evidence to back up our claims. I've argued against JoJo scaling before, and their strategy was simply trying to push back against my side, but without actually proving their side. ( I ended up """winning""" that debate, if you consider nerfing every person's favorite JoJo Part a win. )the why is isn't immesurable needs to be explained, and just saying "can't prove a negative" isn't going to cut it, immesurable is already explained, this is a downgrade thread, not a upgrade one, the burden of proof is on the downgrade side to prove their claims in order to downgrade