- 8,666
- 13,334
What feat are we talking about?Okay. That can probably be used to scale most of the other Harry Potter characters from then, given that Pettigrew was a comparatively very weak wizard.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What feat are we talking about?Okay. That can probably be used to scale most of the other Harry Potter characters from then, given that Pettigrew was a comparatively very weak wizard.
MeeeeeeeeeI evaluated someone calculating Peter Pettigrew's feat a while ago, it was 8-C
I mean if it's outright said to be canon by the original author (and not just an exec) wouldn't that be primary canon?Typically, we'd consider the primary Writer (in this, Rowling) and all their works to be Primary canon.
I agree with game profiles as they're basically completely separate from the main Wizarding World. That is, for the games not made by Portkey, at least. I really think games like Hogwarts Mystery and Hogwarts Legacy (upcoming) should be considered canon due to being personally endorsed by Rowling and made in association with "WIZARDING WORLD Publishing and Theatrical Stage Rights © J.K. Rowling." (the official Potterverse company, owned by Rowling)So we would basically get Book profiles, movies profiles and game profiles
Okay. That makes sense to me.Movie profiles, on the other hand, would probably be redundant. I mean, the Fantastic Beasts films/screenplays were straight up produced/written by Rowling herself and depict events that were already established in the books. They're as canon as the books themselves, so that means the "movie profiles" would only cover the 8 Harry Potter movies, which were made with Rowling's approval and had her helping around the cast (she was very close to the main trio, for example) for their roles, so the overlap would be massive.
So yeah, I don't really think we need a series of nigh-identical profiles for several characters.
It seems like he caused some kind of explosion when he went into hiding.What feat are we talking about?
I don't think there should be movie profiles either, I just don't think the Movies (FBAWTFT & HP) are the Primary canon like the books.Movie profiles, on the other hand, would probably be redundant. I mean, the Fantastic Beasts films/screenplays were straight up produced/written by Rowling herself and depict events that were already established in the books. They're as canon as the books themselves, so that means the "movie profiles" would only cover the 8 Harry Potter movies, which were made with Rowling's approval and had her helping around the cast (she was very close to the main trio, for example) for their roles, so the overlap would be massive.
So yeah, I don't really think we need a series of nigh-identical profiles for several characters.
You don't get it, J.K. Rowling herself wrote the screenplays for the Fantastic Beasts movies, it's clearly primary canon.Since there are some differences with the Fantastic Beasts and where to Find them book (which is mostly a Bestiary and not a novel) and the Movies.
Sounds goodI agree with game profiles as they're basically completely separate from the main Wizarding World. That is, for the games not made by Portkey, at least. I really think games like Hogwarts Mystery and Hogwarts Legacy (upcoming) should be considered canon due to being personally endorsed by Rowling and made in association with "WIZARDING WORLD Publishing and Theatrical Stage Rights © J.K. Rowling." (the official Potterverse company, owned by Rowling)
They're talking about separate game profilesI thought that we are only going to use the novels and movies directly written by Rowling.
The reworked profiles utilise lists rather than the traditional block text.Please elaborate a bit regarding what you mean. I do not remember well.