- 18,393
- 14,323
There is a big reason why we removed type 3 AE because there are characters who identified themselves as a concept/abstraction without even regeneration/immortality benefit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From which evidence?I think AE type 2 works, and it does indeed cover his Type 1 and 8 Immortality.
I think type 2 AE is fineNo he is not AE type 1. He is death but still in physical form which gives him AE type 2.
Now going with this, from where is immortality type 1 coming from? Type 8 from which statement?
...you're asking for proof that a concept can't age? That's not something I need to prove. That's something you'd need to disprove.Evidence of this....?
What, do you think Death can die? Lmao.From which evidence?
Oh wow, a verse did something illogical. We should apply what this one specific verse did to literally all verses.True, kindred in league of legends is literally "death" and got one spotted by a a random Rammus in lore. Oh ya, death can die indeed
@TheMonkeMan
True, kindred in league of legends is literally "death" and got one spotted by a a random Rammus in lore. Oh ya, death can die indeed
@TheMonkeMan
You mean a fiction that is always illogical did something in its nature.Oh wow, a verse did something illogical. We should apply what this one specific verse did to literally all verses.
This is irrelevant because this is NOT league of legends. And the mere idea of Death dying by old age or being hit too hard is beyond illogicalTrue, kindred in league of legends is literally "death" and got one spotted by a a random Rammus in lore. Oh ya, death can die indeed
Type 2 however works based on what Death is thoughThough Type 1 AE is complete bullshit, Death is clearly a physical entity.
Type 1 and physical????? Dude wtfAgree with OP.
For Abstract Existence :
Death said it was his concept of death. This is definitely a Abstract Existence. Death never showed feats such as resurrection/regeneration required to have Type 2 in the movie. Likely "Wolf" is the physical avatar of the concept of Death . Physical appearance in the movie can be explained in this way. Likely Abstract Existence Type 1 is fine.
.
Type 1: Exists purely as an abstraction. These characters lack a true physical form, and affecting them requires the ability to affect directly the abstraction itself, because eventual physical manifestations are merely avatars.
Am I stupid or I don't see a single evidence for type 1 immortality?Is the majority of my hijacking good to apply, BTW?
Am I stupid or I don't see a single evidence for type 1 immortality?
He's literally Death itself. That's why Immortality type 1And the mere idea of Death dying by old age or being hit too hard is beyond illogical
The sandbox looks good to goIs the majority of my hijacking good to apply, BTW?
Am I stupid or I don't see a single evidence for type 1 immortality?
This is not clarification. This is insufficient. You are required to give an evidence for his immortality and not his damn nature or physiologyHe's literally Death itself. That's why Immortality type 1
Immortality comes from the very nature of death. Death is an eternal concept and is just the end of life. He is literally the embodiment of the concept of death. Assuming Death will age and die (permanently) is beyond illogical because this isn't something logical. You can't kill the phenomenon itself (unless you delete the very concept of death), and no amount of mental gymnastics will change thatThis is not clarification. This is insufficient. You are required to give an evidence for his immortality and not his damn nature or physiology
I still need to add shit to it, mostly what I clarified, and there are actual good shit on the page, so if I do get around to it, I'm going through and applying shit sparingly lolThe sandbox looks good to go
No, I mean a fictional verse that did something illogical.You mean a fiction that is always illogical did something in its nature.
But it's just straight up not logical. It's not just me.No we should not apply it to every verse but we are not required to do assumptions because it is not logical for you personally.
Well, if this is the caliber of arguments we're making now, here's my rebuttal:The immortality type 8 and 1 should be removed.
Physical Embodiment of a CONCEPT.Why would a physical entity that embodies death won't die? He is still physical regardless of his embodiment.
It is. Verse says something which this logically leads to. And no, it doesn't.This is not a reason to give him immortality type 1. Also, this comes from your own personal interpretation where a verse itself never imply it or even state it. This needs to be removed.
Wolf is just an avatar. So Wolf can make physical contacts. When he says that he is death, he actually talks about the concept of real death.Type 1 and physical????? Dude wtf
Because Death dying is completely illogical for reason I stated many times before???Why would a physical entity that embodies death won't die?
And? How is that relevant? Doesn't matter physical or not, he's literally the concept of Death, and concepts don't age or dieHe is still physical regardless of his embodiment.
1) He literally states in verse to be Death. As in the phenomenon itself, straight upAlso, this comes from your own personal interpretation where a verse itself never imply it or even state it.
Sure. When 1+1=3 will be true it'll happenThis needs to be removed.
Every fiction is illogical if it has supernatural abilities. What is this argument right nowNo, I mean a fictional verse that did something illogical.
Oh ya, applying what is logical and illogical is not a discussion here. We are discussing if there is a statement or evidence which is not available here.But it's just straight up not logical. It's not just me.
Own threadShould the problems with the 8-C calc the verse scales to be brought up here or in its own thread?
Preferably a new thread.Should the problems with the 8-C calc the verse scales to be brought up here or in its own thread?
None cares if it is logical or not. Oh ya, I wonder why he could not kill cat immediately in matter of seconds if he is real death.Because Death dying is completely illogical for reason I stated many times before???
Because he has a body that can die from aging. You need to give evidence that he is independent of the body itself. And I need evidence, not your interpretationAnd? How is that relevant? Doesn't matter physical or not, he's literally the concept of Death, and concepts don't age or die
He is not AE type 1, so none cares what he said.1) He literally states in verse to be Death. As in the phenomenon itself, straight up
Death and has a body, oh ya. Talking about logic here.2) No??? It's literally logic. Death dying makes no logical sense
How to tell someone you didn't watch the movie without telling them you didn't watch the movie:None cares if it is logical or not. Oh ya, I wonder why he could not kill cat immediately in matter of seconds if he is real death.
There's logic to supernatural things... Unrealistic doesn't equal illogical. This is a stupid argument.Every fiction is illogical if it has supernatural abilities. What is this argument right now
It is very much so a discussion, and your side is the illogical side (as decided by the people saying you're illogical in the thread). The statement saying he is literal death is evidence in of itself. He is a concept, and concepts have inherent things to them.Oh ya, applying what is logical and illogical is not a discussion here. We are discussing if there is a statement or evidence which is not available here.
Because he didn't want to do it immediately. He wanted Puss to experience fear and extend the chase before finally killing him. He even said "why did I played with my food"Oh ya, I wonder why he could not kill cat immediately in matter of seconds if he is real death.
I have nothing more to say to youihavenoidea
Literally thisHow to tell someone you didn't watch the movie without telling them you didn't watch the movie: