ShionAH
He/Him- 16,797
- 5,049
Stop stonewalling we already discussed thisAnd in the first place why he not erased his power??? He hate that, why he make he himself have that power??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stop stonewalling we already discussed thisAnd in the first place why he not erased his power??? He hate that, why he make he himself have that power??
I know what R>F isIt's not an R>F difference. R>F status is basically "being more real".
But the context here has nothing to do with R>FI know what R>F is
And Looney's tier 1s are 1:1 example of what i described
Because you as a reader have R>F over the fictional plot in Saiki.But the context here has nothing to do with R>F
pretty sure mangas are fiction to the readers geor.But the context here has nothing to do with R>F
Again, it is not enough... It depends on the context in the verse. You will need more than that. I've already spoken with shionpretty sure mangas are fiction to the readers geor.
Since you dont really know the context or the verse I can see your confusion. Its okayAgain, it is not enough... It depends on the context in the verse. You will need more than that. I've already spoken with shion
I don't understand where the 2-C AP comes from. Since when is merging 2 universes a 2-C AP? lolAgree: ShionAH, Abscoolguy, DarkDragonMedeus, CloverDragon03 (Didnt give opinion on Low 1-C), FeebasExE, possibly Andytrenom (Accepts Sight Energy as 2-C), Tago238 (Other key),
Disagree: Fixxed
Neutral:
Since forever. It's fine if you've decided to disagree. The staff votes matter anywayI don't understand where the 2-C AP comes from. Since when is merging 2 universes a 2-C AP? lol
Also put me in the disagree
Lmao it's okay. Admins like DT and Qawsedf have already dealt with this verse before. Wait for them and others.Since forever. It's fine if you've decided to disagree. The staff votes matter anyway
"Significantly affect" is here used as an umbrella term for feats that don't involve direct creation or destruction but are comparable to them in power, such as warping and distorting the entirety of the structure in question, sustaining its existence with energy, merging the structure with another one, etc.
But this is not something that is done "physically." This is done with "Sight Energy" or psy energy (whatever), which is part of the UES. It's not a direct physical scale. It's just 4-D hax, for this you have to prove that UES and AP are the same.
Dog do you know the verse? Did you read the manga, novel or anything?I didn't understand, if the only thing Saiki did using his psy energy and that of another Saiki was to make a distortion similar to that of sight energy, why does it scale to sight energy? Since distortion between universes of sight energy is obviously a 2C feat.
I just watched the anime.Dog do you know the verse? Did you read the manga, novel or anything?
Thats why you are confused.I just watched the anime.
This was already discussed several times. The anti feats are argued and they were rejected
the entire story is written by him, he could erase any "obstacle" he might have, but he doesnt, probably to keep things interesting or something, idkFor what reason lol? Saiki having plot manipulation would mean he would have never had any conflicts ever outside of maybe those who are his friends and Saiki's main anti feat is like, the most serious plot arc in the entire series.
His alter version does it and he turns up to be a evil power hungry maniac. So whatever Saiki did worked up just fine for him. This was already adressed anywayFor what reason lol? Saiki having plot manipulation would mean he would have never had any conflicts ever outside of maybe those who are his friends and Saiki's main anti feat is like, the most serious plot arc in the entire series.
a fraction of 5-d is still 5-d unless the potency is stated to be muddledi still think for hax to scale to 5-D it has to have 5-D showings instead of just "comes from somewhere 5-D", especially considering the only thing it's been shown to do is 4-D
like the range is absolutely fine, sure, but the potency? idk
i'll be the first to acknowledge i'm not particularly knowledgable on this kinda stuff but it just seems off
Georr you said whatever you wanted to say. Would you kindly leave now? I dont know what more you want use to say to youThe discussion of 5-D not here is really funny. Contexts are not a reference to R>F.
Anyway... Let's wait for other tier 1 staffs
Clover can't evaluate Crt'sCloverDragon03 (Didnt give opinion on Low 1-C)
No, I will not leave. I'd even say worse for you. If this passes I will open a downgrade revisionGeorr you said whatever you wanted to say. Would you kindly leave now? I dont know what more you want use to say to you
I really dont care what you do also saying you will make a spite CRT is not a good idea.No, I will not leave. I'd even say worse for you. If this passes I will open a downgrade revision
Which you dont know since you have no comtext on the verse.Because there are differences between the interpretation made by assumption and the contexts.
It's up to you to prove it. Saying "you don't know the verse" is a very bad approach.Which you dont know since you have no comtext on the verse.
Which I tried to. You disagreed. Then you kept commenting.It's up to you to prove it.
Multiple times??? It just stated one times. Where the other???It's stated multiple times he can. He just decides not to.
No, that argument is never discussed in any CRT before. Can you show me where that argument being discussed??Stop stonewalling we already discussed this
The fact he didnt do it make that it just a gag in the context of this verse. Bruh you dont debunk my argument at all, the OP reason that "he allows it" it not make sense because he allows it but then he not allows it???@Fixxed I have a problem with your stance.
The fact he doesn't use it doesnt mean he doesnt have it. Thats why theres such a thing on the wiki as "In-character" .
It happened one time =a gag?The fact he didnt do it make that it just a gag in the context of this verse. Bruh you dont debunk my argument at all, the OP reason that "he allows it" it not make sense because he allows it but then he not allows it???
Feel freeNo, I will not leave. I'd even say worse for you. If this passes I will open a downgrade revision
There was no assumption. I've proven you wrong over and over again. You don't even know what qualifies for 2CBecause there are differences between the interpretation made by assumption and the contexts.
So what are they a reference to.The discussion of 5-D not here is really funny. Contexts are not a reference to R>F.
And that's how we as readers treat the franchise of SaikiPotential mediums for viewing a cosmology as fiction include: written media (Books or stories), images (Paintings, comics, or movies), data (Simulations or video games), or mental constructs (thoughts or dreams). All of the above would be considered less 'real' than the person who views the cosmology as such, and can directly imply qualitative superiority.
And you'll be proven wrong again, as usualAnyway... Let's wait for other tier 1 staffs
Ignore Fixxed, he already said those stuff and we argued now he is stonewalling for the sake of stonewalling lolSnip
It not even "happened" it just stated. One times statement and the context is very vagueIt happened one time =a gag?
Who taught you that ,
Prove it is a gag. And since when did Saiki become a gag character.
And I bet you don't even know the verse
You've repeated the same thing over and over again. Your feelings mean nothing if you don't have any solid evidence that it was a gag
He allows it but then he not allows it???
I dont know where is my stonewalling when you guys not even debunk any of my argumentIgnore Fixxed, he already said those stuff and we argued now he is stonewalling for the sake of stonewalling lol